So it statement has absolutely nothing feel unless of course this is not informed me exactly what was understood because “integration”


Реклама:

Реклама:


So it statement has absolutely nothing feel unless of course this is not informed me exactly what was understood because “integration”

8. Para. 33 [See new part 56]: “It has to be recognised that part of the Russian-speaking community in Latvia resists integration”. Many researchers concluded that the main problem is that the very concept of integration is interpreted in different ways by the government and the Russian-speaking community: while the official policies stress acquisition of the Latvian language, and acceptance of the “official” version of history, citizenship legislation and language policies as the main criteria for integration, the Russian-speakers emphasise that integration is a two-way road, and advocate the need to ensure their effective participation in decision-making, and recognition of and respect to their distinct identity – in particular, by adapting the system of state government to the multicultural and multilingual nature of the Latvia’s society. In other words, the questions is whether the respect to cultural diversity and full implementation of minority rights is a part of the integration concept or not. Thus, the statement quoted above is somewhat misleading – it would be better to stress the differences in approaches to the integration concept.

9. Para. 33 and footnote 5 [See new paragraph 56 and you may footnote 8]: the footnote is very essential, indeed. However, the real picture is even more salient. It is worth mentioning that the pre-election programme of the Latvian People’s Front (LPF) in 1990 elections (when, for the last time, all residents were allowed to vote) contained a provision which for any practical reason could not be understood otherwise than “the zero option” (i.e. citizenship for everybody). This was one of the reasons why many Russian-speakers voted for the LPF then, thus ensuring its constitutional majority and the restoration of independence by parliamentary way. Thus, the non-citizens believe, and not without good reasons, that the legislators elected by them simply deprived their own electors of political rights, meanwhile keeping their https://datingmentor.org/nl/fitness-singles-overzicht/ mandates. Under these circumstances, the word “misunderstanding” hardly reflects the reality, and it is simply not true that “such sentiments are …without foundation”. As one of the LPF leaders, A. We chose deception” (Latvia – whose homeland? Report about the conference organized by the Heinrich Boll Stiftung, Riga: Goete Institute, 1994, in Latvian).

10. Para. 34 [See new paragraphs 53 and you can 54]: 42% is the figure for those ethnic Russians who were registered as citizens since they could trace their roots back to the citizens of the pre-war Latvia, not the number of those arrived after WW2.

The latest figure 6000 into Russian-talking connectivity looks greatly overestimated, always 2 till 4 countless her or him formally inserted (and many dozens extremely doing work) is actually mentioned

11. Para. 35 [See new part sixty]: “Everyone agreed that the cultural rights of the minorities were respected. The NGOs also agreed that legislation complied with the minimum recommendations made by international organisations (the OSCE and the Council of Europe)”.

Panteleevs, told inside the 1994: “We’d a choice – often so you’re able to deceive [this new Russian-speakers], or even shoot

The fresh new declaration musical sometime unusual – what is actually meant just like the “cultural legal rights”? Is the to education during the mom tongue, or the directly to have fun with fraction language prior to societal regulators provided? And you will what exactly are this type of “minimum pointers”? Including, both OSCE as well as the Council off Europe consistently demanded in order to grant this new voting rights during the municipal elections for non-owners, and this is clearly perhaps not observed.

Out-of specific NGO agencies just who participated in the fresh meetings which have the fresh new rapporteur, We read different types of whatever they told you. I am scared the section will be competitive inside the Latvia on purely truthful base, which means that trustworthiness of one’s entire statement would-be questioned.

tags
Меток нет

Нет Ответов

Добавить комментарий

Ваш адрес email не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *

Реклама:

Создание Сайта Кемерово, Создание Дизайна, продвижение Кемерово, Умный дом Кемерово, Спутниковые телефоны Кемерово - Партнёры