Matchmaking ranging from sexting behaviours and you can associated attributes

Studies was in fact analysed playing with SPSS twenty-five.0. Very first detailed analyses had been did, as well as Cronbach’s alphas and you can wavelengths. Binary logistic regressions were used to evaluate contacts between sex, decades, intimate positioning, having an intimate/sexual companion, SNS utilized, sexting normalisation and you can readiness to engage in sexting as the independent variables, together with four sexting Avustralya kadД±n yГјz profili behaviours due to the fact founded details. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen dos is thought to be a measure of impact size. All parameters was inserted on the model on top of that. The analysis was also stratified by intercourse.

Frequency from sexting behaviors

The most frequent sexting behaviours are becoming (21.2%) and getting via a mediator (28.4%), followed closely by 3rd-team forwarding away from sexual stuff (9.3%) and you can, finally, sending (8.1%). Detailed statistics get when you look at the Desk 2.

The new regression habits was basically tall. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen 2 was .42 to your “sending” model, .31 for the “receiving” model, .23 on the “third-class forwarding” design, and you will .17 towards the “receiving thru a mediator” model (Table step 3:

Regarding “sending” model, readiness in order to sext (OR: 8.26; 95% rely on interval [CI]: 5.36-), having an enchanting/intimate partner (OR: step 3.44; 95% CI: dos.25-5.25), playing with Snapchat (OR: step one.87; 95% CI: step 1.19-dos.93), sexual direction (OR: 1.77; 95% CI: step 1.04-step 3.00) and you may many years (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.step one4-step 1.63) was basically significantly associated with giving wedding. On “receiving” design, that have an intimate/sexual lover (OR: step three.dos7; 95% CI: dos.51-cuatro.28), desire so you can sext (OR: dos.79; 95% CI: 2.01-step three.89), using Instagram (OR: 1.89; 95% CI: step 1.16-step three.10), sex (OR: step 1.82; 95% CI: step 1.37-2.41), using Snapchat (OR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.dos1-dos.14), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.49; 95% CI: step 1.20-step one.86) and you will decades (OR: step one.26; 95% CI: step one.step 12-step one.41) were rather related to searching wedding.

From the “third-team forwarding” model, using Instagram (OR: dos.74; 95% CI: 1.16-six.51), readiness in order to sext (OR: 2.00; 95% CI: step one.48-2.72), intercourse (OR: step one.96; 95% CI: step one.32-dos.91), that have an enchanting/sexual lover (OR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.29-dos.68), using Twitter (OR: step 1.53; 95% CI: 1.03-dos.26), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.43; 95% CI: step 1.09-step one.87) and you will decades (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.22-step one.66) were significantly regarding involvement into the third-cluster forwarding.

About “receiving thru an intermediary” design, playing with Instagram (OR: 2.16; 95% CI: step one.47-step 3.19), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.84; 95% CI: step 1.5dos-dos.24), that have an intimate/intimate mate (OR: step one.7step one; 95% CI: step 1.35-dos.17), gender (OR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.11-step 1.80) and decades (OR: step 1.36; 95% CI: step 1.23-1.49) had been rather about engagement inside searching via an intermediary.

Intercourse differences

The fresh regression models was basically high. Nagelkerke’s R dos are .50 for girls and you will .41 to own boys for the “sending” model; .31 for girls and .30 getting people toward “receiving” model; .18 for women and you can .twenty four to possess men toward “third-people forwarding” model; and you will .14 for females and you can .22 to possess males towards “getting via a mediator” design (Dining table cuatro:

Throughout the “sending” design, for females, desire to sext (OR: ; 95% CI: -), that have a romantic/intimate companion (OR: 4.54; 95% CI: dos.27-nine.09) and many years (OR: step 1.60; 95% CI: step one.17-dos.20) was indeed rather connected with delivering involvement. To own males, these people were desire in order to sext (OR: 6.05; 95% CI: step 3.68-nine.94), with a romantic/intimate mate (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: step 1.59-cuatro.88) and using Snapchat (OR: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.32-cuatro.29).

Regarding the “receiving” design, for women, readiness to sext (OR: 5.11; 95% CI: dos.57-), playing with Instagram (OR: cuatro.34; 95% CI: 1.43-), that have an enchanting/sexual spouse (OR: step three.77; 95% CI: dos.49-5.72), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.62; 95% CI: step 1.13-2.33) and many years (OR: step one.42; 95% CI: 1.17-step 1.72) was significantly associated with choosing engagement. Getting boys, they were with a romantic/sexual lover (OR: 2.97; 95% CI: 2.08-cuatro.25), willingness in order to sext (OR: dos.32; 95% CI: step 1.58-step three.41), using Snapchat (OR: 2.03; 95% CI: step one.38-dos.91), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.06-step 1.86) and you may years (OR: step 1.20; 95% CI: 1.04-step one.38).